Translate

Powered by Blogger.

Wednesday, July 30, 2008

Where Is the Shining Light Among the Media?

***

In the far less crowded political media landscape of 1973 two young investigative reporters from the Washington Post propelled the Watergate scandal into the national headlines. Congress and particularly Senator Sam Ervin’s Watergate investigation committee picked up the gauntlet and brought down a president, top advisors and cabinet members.

Since the turn of the millennium with the rise of cable news and seemingly infinite growth and influence of the Internet, only Representative Dennis Kucinich has had the balls to take a stand by introducing articles of impeachment against Bush and Cheney in the House of Representatives. Where are the media? They’ll blast an open mic gaffe while bleeping out “balls”. Yet when it certainly looks like something’s rotten in the executive branch there’s just a lot of hand wringing, breast beating and whining. And that’s from the liberal media.

In these days of hot stories having a day, a few days or, in the case of celebrity news, a week or more, what happened to Scott McClellan’s tell-all book? Are there not at least a few worthy kernels in McClellan’s book which might have piqued the interest of a reporter or prosecutor? With the exception of Mr. McClellan, does this administration have its people in such fear that not one of them can be a Deep-Throat for what history may find as one of the most corrupt and misguided presidencies in US history?

Yes, these comments lack specificity. I’m no more in the know than any citizen, hence the lack of specificity. Am I alone in thinking that there’s been a bunch of shit going on behind the scenes of the Bush administration? I know I’m not. Are there no brighter minds than mine in the media who can blow the whistle?

Yes. His name is Keith Olbermann. Please watch and listen.



















The Dentist Skit – Tim Conway & Harvey Korman

The classic skit from “The Carol Burnett Show”.

Monday, July 28, 2008

Assaults on Language Rant 1

Beating to the punch those who have disagreed with me on this pet peeve, I acknowledge that our language is shaped by the times and common usage. Words are added to the dictionary as technology advances, society evolves and slang becomes accepted language. Words and meanings are discarded if/when they become archaic.

A classic example is the urban legend that Eskimos have many more ways than we do of communicating different types of snow. For this article let’s assume the urban legend to be true and ask why there are different words for different types of snow events and snow itself. With snow being such an important part of Eskimo life, each word for snow communicates a specific snow or snow-related concept. Remove a few of those words and the Eskimos would be unable to communicate those concepts without using several phrases with adjectives. Once the word is lost, its meaning and concept cannot be communicated with clarity and precision. The ability to communicate a precise idea is lost.

My #1 example is the word “unique”. It means and communicates “one of a kind” – nothing like it exists anywhere else. Slowly but surely, that meaning is being eroded. A quick look for definitions of “unique” shows the erosion of its definition by misuse.

[A discussion on this word with friends led to the squeezy-horn on the couch example. I know one reader will remember that one. Yeah, don’t ask – long story.]

How “unique” is misused is simple to explain. The word is too frequently used in degrees. People say that something is “more unique”, “most unique”, “not as unique”, “less unique”, etc. The common thread is degrees of uniqueness. I ask you: How can anything be more one of a kind than something else? Either it’s unique or it’s not. Nonetheless, the misuse of the word has become prevalent, thus eroding its meaning and creeping in to dictionaries as a definition of the word.

This is more than common usage adjusting our language. It is the loss of a concept – an idea which can be communicated in one word. We lose the word’s definition and we’re left with what has become common practice in conversation: repeating a word or phrase to emphasize to the listener that the repeated word is conveying something a bit different than were it not repeated. So we could be reduced to saying “Wow, that was unique-unique!” to convey that it was actually one of a kind. “She was upset-upset” conveying the degree to which someone was upset. Makes me wonder if those repeated words will ever get in to dictionaries. Maybe they already have.

Is proper grammar important in communication? Depends on how much sought to be communicated is lost due to improper grammar. The improper use of pronouns is an example of how miscommunications can result. “He” “She” “It” “They”, etc. without clear identifying precedent nouns lead to ambiguity and an exponential spread of incorrect information. Example: “Mr. Jones from the company called to tell me that he needed more info to write Mr. Smith’s business. I called him to explain the situation and the issue has been resolved.” OK – exactly who was called?

Another of my readers will remember this one: What had always been the past tense of “sneak”? Answer: “sneaked”. Now, the preferred past tense is snuck, with sneaked nearly relegated to a footnote. As a language purist that has always bugged me, but understand the change as a result of speakers of English molding the language with changing times and practice. Contrary to the meaning changes discussed above, this does not change or eliminate a concept, just the word used to express it.

One last peeve for sports fans. Sports announcers avoid the possessive case like typhoid. It is “the ball went right through the legs of Bill Buckner” rather than “ … through Buckner’s legs.” “The pass went right through the hands of Johnson” rather than “…Johnson’s hands.” “The ball tipped the glove of Posada” rather than “ … Posada’s glove”. See if you notice this while watching a ballgame. Me – I just find it baffling.

Saturday, July 26, 2008

100 Seinfeld Quotes

***



***

Being Politically Upfront With Readers

Barack Obama is my choice for the next president of the United States. He caught my eye when elected to the Senate in 2004 and has been my choice since he became a presumptive candidate in 2006. More politics in future posts.

To save the pic below as 1024 x 768 wallpaper, please click the Media Fire download link:

http://www.mediafire.com/imageview.php?quickkey=yljxdn5lwze&thumb=4




Change Your Cable Modem’s IP Address – XP Pro SP2

[See screen prints below.]


Shut off any networked PC

Take note of your IP (e.g., go to
www.ipchicken.com)

Disconnect your network cable

Disconnect the power from your cable modem.

Go to start, control panel, network connections...now RIGHT click on your internet connection...select properties.

Next to the box that says “Connect Using” (where your network card is listed) click on the configure button.

Click on the Advanced tab. Highlight “network address” on the list. Click the radio button for Value.

In this field enter something like 00-1b-11-aa-bb-cc or 00:1b:11:aa:bb:cc then hit OK.

Put the power back on the cable router

Wait till it syncs up by turning all the lights on.

Connect your network cable.

[Many thanks to Alex for this tip.]


SNL - Martin Short as Ed Grimley


Wednesday, July 23, 2008

When Insults Had Class

"He has all the virtues I dislike and none of the vices I admire."
-- Winston Churchill

"A modest little person, with much to be modest about."
-- Winston Churchill

"I have never killed a man, but I have read many obituaries with great pleasure."
-- Clarence Darrow

"He has never been known to use a word that might send a reader to the dictionary."
-- William Faulkner (about Ernest Hemingway)

"Poor Faulkner. Does he really think big emotions come from big words?"
-- Ernest Hemingway (about William Faulkner)

"Thank you for sending me a copy of your book; I'll waste no time reading it."
-- Moses Hadas

"I could carve a man with more backbone out of a banana."
-- Teddy Roosevelt

"He can compress the most words into the smallest idea of any man I know."
-- Abraham Lincoln

"I've had a perfectly wonderful evening. But this wasn't it."
-- Groucho Marx

"I didn't attend the funeral, but I sent a nice letter saying I approved of it."
-- Mark Twain

"He has no enemies, but is intensely disliked by his friends."
-- Oscar Wilde

"I am enclosing two tickets to the first night of my new play; bring a friend.... if you have one.."
-- George Bernard Shaw to Winston Churchill

"Cannot possibly attend first night, will attend second... if there is one."
-- Winston Churchill, in response

"I feel so miserable without you; it's almost like having you here."
-- Stephen Bishop

"He is a self-made man and worships his creator."
-- John Bright

"I've just learned about his illness. Let's hope it's nothing trivial."
-- Irvin S. Cobb

"He is not only dull himself, he is the cause of dullness in others."
-- Samuel Johnson

"He is simply a shiver looking for a spine to run up."
-- Paul Keating

"He had delusions of adequacy."
-- Walter Kerr

"There's nothing wrong with you that reincarnation won't cure."
-- Jack E. Leonard

"He has the attention span of a lightning bolt."
-- Robert Redford

"They never open their mouths without subtracting from the sum of human knowledge."
-- Thomas Brackett Reed

"He inherited some good instincts from his Quaker forebears, but by diligent hard work, he overcame them."
-- James Reston (about Richard Nixon)

"In order to avoid being called a flirt, she always yielded easily."
-- Charles, Count Talleyrand

"He loves nature in spite of what it did to him."
-- Forrest Tucker

"Why do you sit there looking like an envelope without any address on it?"
-- Mark Twain

"His mother should have thrown him away and kept the stork."
-- Mae West

"Some cause happiness wherever they go; others, whenever they go."
-- Oscar Wilde

"He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lamp-posts... for support rather than illumination."
-- Andrew Lang (1844-1912)

"He has Van Gogh's ear for music."
-- Billy Wilder

Test Answers








Tuesday, July 22, 2008

Male Sweat A Turn On

***

[To those who just let out a big “e-u-u-u”, you know not what you’re missing.]

What Women [and Gay Men] Like About Male Sweat and Why

A new study reveals that the ability to detect a certain male hormone in sweat is genetic. What that tells us about the science of smell—and why some women like sweaty men.

MSNBC.com WEB EXCLUSIVE

By Joan Raymond
Newsweek
Updated: 12:02 p.m. ET Sept 18, 2007

Sept. 18, 2007 - Liz Gabor calls the odor “man sweat.” And though she’s loath to admit it, the aromatic scent makes her feel, as she calls it, a little frisky. “My friends think I’m crazy, but I think male sweat is kind of pleasant and, well, kind of hot,” says Gabor, 28, a customer service rep and happily married mother of two young girls.




Gabor doesn’t have a honker that’s on the fritz. Rather, her penchant for “man sweat” is all in her genes, according to new research from Rockefeller and Duke Universities published this week in the journal Nature. Scientists have previously found an association between male sweat and female arousal, but this study is the first to find a gene that is linked to the ability to smell a specific chemical in the sweat. And that, they say, may be a revolution in the understanding of how our olfactory sense functions.

According to the Rockefeller and Duke researchers, about 70 percent of adult men and women have the genetic capacity to perceive a particular chemical called androstenone in male body odor. To them, the testosterone-laden substance can take on a pleasant bouquet similar to vanilla or other sweet or woodsy scents. Others who have a functional copy of the gene perceive androstenone as less than pleasurable, akin to the aromatic elixir of stale urine. About 30 percent of adult men and women can’t smell androstenone at all, leading researchers to suspect they might be missing the gene responsible for smelling the aroma.

To figure out exactly who could smell the manly-man scent of androstenone, researchers presented 400 participants with 66 different odors, including woodsy scents like pine, strong scents like garlic, and esoteric odors like methanethiol, a man-made scent that is similar to the smell of urine after a person has eaten asparagus.

DNA taken from blood samples was then analyzed, and those individuals who could smell androstenone were found to have genetic variations in a single odorant receptor called OR7D4. Whether they perceived androstenone as pleasant or foul smelling was due to two tiny changes in the gene, called single nucleotide polymorphisms, that made the odorant receptor stop functioning.

For researchers who are trying to unravel the complicated way people perceive certain aromas, finding a genetic link to at least one smell—male body odor—is akin to finding a Rosetta Stone. “There is a mystery as to how the nose works, well beyond the whole realm of male sweat,” says neuroscientist Charles J. Wysocki, Ph.D., a member of the Monell Chemical Senses Center in Philadelphia and one of the world’s leading olfactory science researchers. “Quite frankly, I am jealous of them.”

While being able to smell androstenone may seem like an attribute that you can live without, the chemical may have some broader implications than making us scream “ewwww.” Or in the case of some women, “aaahhh.”

But so far scientists know less about androstenone’s effects on humans than its effects on pigs. And what they do know about pigs is enough to make any researcher blush. The chemical, which is found in large concentrations in the saliva of male pigs, acts like an aphrodisiac among the porcine set.

Once female pigs catch a whiff of androstenone they immediately assume a posture called lordosis, replete with a curved back and wiggly haunches. “Essentially, they ready themselves for mating,” says Wysocki. Because of that rapid, well, response, human marketers have jumped on the androstenone bandwagon, hawking male deodorants and sprays that promise to make men irresistible to women.

“At this point there isn’t any scientific evidence that a spray of androstenone is going to help any guy get lucky,” says lead researcher Leslie Vosshall, Ph.D., the Chemers Family Associate Professor and head of the Laboratory of Neurogenetics and Behavior at Rockefeller University. “Plus, if the woman he’s hot for doesn’t have a functional copy of the gene, she won’t even smell it.” And of course there’s always that pesky problem that she may simply perceive it as stale urine mixed with some Armani.

But men shouldn’t give up yet. Researchers have already shown that the complex soup of chemicals that comprise “man sweat” can elicit some unusual physiological responses in some women: an increased heart rate, a better mood and sexual arousal. Male sweat can also effect the secretion of luteinizing hormone, which is involved in stimulating ovulation.

“There is a lot more to male sweat than it just being a funny anecdote,” says Vosshall, who plans a series of studies that use the genetic find to determine the compound’s role in social hierarchies. Since men with high levels of testosterone sweat out equally high levels of androstenone, “the question is, will a woman respond to those levels, will she, in a sense, sniff out the manliest man in a group?” says Vosshall.

Until that question is answered, getting rid of body odor may still be the best bet for men wanting to attract a woman. “There is a lot more to smell and human relationships than what we know as scientists,” says Monell’s Wysocki. “But there is no good evidence that if a happily married woman catches a whiff of a particular chemical found in male sweat that she’ll up and leave her husband.” That can only be good news for the Gabors.

http://www.newsweek.com/id/40963

***

Dr. Laura and the Bible


Dr. Laura Schlessinger is a US radio personality who dispenses advice to people who call in to her radio show. Recently, she stated that, as an observant Orthodox Jew, homosexuality is an abomination according to Leviticus 18:22, and cannot be condoned under any circumstance.

The following is an open letter to Dr. Laura.

Dear Dr. Laura:

Thank you for doing so much to educate people regarding God's Law. I have learned a great deal from your show and, when someone tries to defend the homosexual lifestyle, for example, I simply remind them that Leviticus 18:22 clearly states it to be an abomination. End of debate.





However I do need some further advice from you regarding some of the other specific laws and how to follow them.

1. When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it creates a pleasing odor for the Lord - Lev.1:9. The problem is my neighbors. They claim the odor is not pleasing to them. Should I smite them?

2. I would like to sell my daughter into slavery, as sanctioned in Exodus 21:7. In this day and age, what do you think would be a fair price for her?

3. I know that I am allowed no contact with a woman while she is in her period of menstrual cleanliness - Lev.15:19-24. The problem is, how do I tell? I have tried asking but that only produces a call to 911.

4. Lev. 25:44 states that I may indeed possess slaves, both male and female, provided they are purchased from neighboring nations. A friend of mine claims that this applies to Mexicans, but not Canadians. Can you clarify? Why can't I own Canadians?

5. I have a neighbor who insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus 35:2 clearly states he should be put to death. Am I morally obligated to kill him myself?

6. A friend of mine feels that even though eating shellfish is an abomination - Lev. 11:10, it is a lesser abomination than homosexuality. How can this be?

7. Lev. 21:20 states that I may not approach the altar of God if I have a defect in my sight. I must admit that I wear reading glasses. Does my vision have to be 20/20, or is there some wiggle room here?

8. Most of my male friends get their hair trimmed, including the hair around their temples, even though this is expressly forbidden by Lev.19:27. How should they die?

9. I know from Lev. 11:6-8 that touching the skin of a dead pig makes me unclean. May I still play football if I wear gloves?

10. My uncle has a farm. He violates Lev. 19:19 by planting two different crops in the same field, as does his wife by wearing garments made of two different kinds of thread (cotton/polyester blend). He also tends to curse and blaspheme a lot. Is it really necessary that we go to all the trouble of getting the whole town together to stone them? Lev.24:10-16. Couldn't we just burn them to death at a private family affair like we do with people who sleep with their in-laws? (Lev. 20:14)

I know you have studied these things extensively, so I am confident you can help me.

Thank you.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

August 17, 2010 Update: Dr. Laura announced on Larry King Live that upon the expiration of her contract in the fall she will no longer being doing radio shows. This follows her apology for using the "N" word 7-8 times while "counseling" a Black woman on her interracial marriage.


***

The King of New Jersey

Napoleon Bonaparte’s older brother Joseph was King of Naples and then King of Spain in Napoleonic Europe. After Napoleon’s defeat at Waterloo, Joseph escaped France and sailed to the US in exile while his younger brother served his exile on the island of Elba. Joseph settled in Burlington County, New Jersey – near Bordentown, 25 miles outside of Philadelphia. While never becoming a US citizen, the New Jersey legislature passed a statute allowing the King to own land in the state. On his land he built “Point Breeze” a European style estate. From 1816-1839 he lived as Count de Survilliers. His New Jersey neighbors called him Mr. Bonaparte.

http://www.flatrock.org.nz/topics/new_jersey/new_jerseys_ex_king.htm

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1026/is_4_162/ai_92545137





Monday, July 21, 2008

Gay Pride Day 1994 - New York City

 ***

In 1994, NYC hosted the Gay Games, previously known as the Gay Olympics before the USOC protested the use of “Olympics” by gays. Gays and lesbians from all over the world converged on the city. 11,000 athletes from 2,000 cities in 40 countries on 6 continents competed in 31 sporting events. Add to that friends of athletes, spectators, those who flock to NYC annually for GPD, the 25th anniversary of the Stonewall riots, all the gay people living here and you get an idea of the state of the city during the 8 days of the Games, Gay Pride Day and that year’s parade. Opening ceremonies for the Games took place at Wein Stadium at Columbia U. Closing ceremonies were at a sold out Yankee Stadium with all 55,000+ seats occupied.


For the first time, the parade that year took place on 1st Avenue and featured the largest gay flag ever displayed – it was blocks long. The crowds that year were overflowing west of 1st Avenue through 2nd. The entire east side of Manhattan was packed. I went up there myself as my partner was sleeping. I caught the parade at the UN. Incredibly enough, I ran into 2 friends there – amazing considering the number of people swarming around the parade. Having gone to Indiana University, I joined the Indiana contingent for a few blocks. I was seriously fired up.


1994 was the first year that a moment of silence was observed at 2 PM in honor of those who died of AIDS. It’s been done every year since. When I tell you that the crowd was huge and incredibly loud in cheering and applauding, I’m probably understating it. Just look at that pic – how incredibly thrilling was that view?! That’s exactly what I saw from the UN – that gigantic flag stretching as far as the eye could see.


At 2 PM I was still standing with my friends – all of us shirtless. (Yeah, I used to have a good body – a fond memory now.) At 2 PM, the minute of silence, I thought I’d gone deaf. For real. I have never experienced anything like that in my life. With the millions of people lining that route as well as the thousands upon thousands of marchers, you could literally hear a pin drop. There was absolute dead silence. I was incredulous and moved like I’ve rarely been moved in my life.

Another annual tradition on Gay Pride Day in NYC is an early evening dance. It was traditionally held on a huge pier jutting out into the Hudson River off West Street just north of Christopher. In 1994 this dance was held instead on the United States Navy aircraft carrier “U.S.S. Enterprise” docked as a museum on the Hudson River in Midtown. The Enterprise, among the most decorated naval vessels in the history of the US Navy, was swarming with gay guys dancing our drug-fried brains out.


For more info about 1994’s Gay Games and Gay Pride Day in NYC:


http://thecastro.net/gaygames/gaygamesIV.html

Sunday, July 20, 2008

Rubbernecking

Rubbernecking must be up there if not topping preventable causes of traffic. But how can’t you look at an accident while sitting in the rubbernecking traffic? If I don’t look how will that speed things up? An accident happens. A car or group of cars decides to slow way down to gawk. How slow were they going while gawking to start the chain reaction of miles of cars creeping past the accident scene backing up traffic for miles? We’re not even on the same side of the highway as the accident! We’re slowing down for a look – maybe we’ll see a body part or blood.

Not surprisingly, taking rubbernecking to its extreme is George Carlin in an excerpt from his 2001 appearance on the Tonight Show with Jay Leno.


Mona the Comedian




If Mona doesn't at least make you smile you're reading the wrong blog :-)

From Across the River




FROM ACROSS THE RIVER *


Thoughts from a native New Yorker recently transplanted to New Jersey


[* Written shortly after 9/11/01. Opinions expressed about GW Bush are couched in the tragedy of the time.]

It is still difficult to comprehend the enormity of the devastation. Only when my mind sort of "expands" am I able to fathom what happened on Tuesday - those flashes shake me to my very soul. I truly regret not living in the city at this time, feeling guilty being sheltered here across the river. I understand the effort and volunteerism pouring into Manhattan from across the country and around the world.

It is neither an overstatement nor a knee-jerk reaction to the immediacy of the horror to accept that the world has changed forever. We are witnesses to and participants in a defining event in world history - likely the defining event that will shape the world for the foreseeable future.

Do we all feel personally assaulted and violated? Are we all really so deeply patriotic to feel that such an attack on a tiny part of the US is a personal violation of each and every citizen of the world? I think so.

I am too frightened to cry or get choked up by flashes of Tuesday's horror. Listening to interviews with those desperately searching for lost loved ones is far too painful. What has moved me to tears several times has been the patriotic outpouring across the country and the world. Just now, before sitting down at my computer, I watched for the umpteenth time President Bush's bullhorned remarks to the rescue workers. This time, seeing the faces of the workers shouting "USA" brought tears to my eyes.

Thursday night, ABC did 2 pieces to wrap up one of its hours. You could see that Peter Jennings was near tears after each one. The first was a brief piece on Queen Elizabeth's Coldstream Guards being "ordered" by the Queen to play the "Star Spangled Banner" in front of Buckingham Palace. A tearful crowd stood in silence as the British band played our national anthem. The piece brought tears to my eyes. Following that was a report on the prevalent display of American flags. While a relatively mundane report, it evoked in me a deep sense of patriotism and again tears flowed.

This is the latest example of how a US president rises to the occasion - how the office itself is far bigger than its individual occupant. Despite Bush having been portrayed for so long as no more than a doofus, I am impressed with his performance in this crisis. There is a comforting feeling - shared by him with the rescue workers - to see our president take control and speak for the nation. It's the office that has this effect - not so much the man.

It is chilling to see and hear fighter planes patrolling the skies and warships stationed off our coastline. It is chilling to hear reports that more terrorists bent on further attacks are likely still in the country. It is chilling to learn that one of the hijackers lived in my own town here in New Jersey. It is chilling to be in a war zone. And it is likely that this is our country's immediate future. Will anyone really feel safe anymore? In our history, war and its devastation have always been "over there." Not any more. It is time for America to join the rest of the world in that respect. Imagine what it must have been like for Great Britain during WWII. Imagine what it was like for Great Britain under constant attack by IRA terrorists. Imagine what it is like for Israel – existing for 53 years under the daily threat of war, death and terror.

We have, in so many respects, been a sheltered nation - protected by our natural borders. Not since the War of 1812 have foreign enemy forces wreaked destruction in our country. Since then there has been a sense of invulnerable complacency - allowing us to enjoy freedoms and convenience not possible in other countries. As the world became smaller it was just a matter of time before the US would join the rest of the world in facing destruction and threats of destruction at home from terrorists and fanatics abroad. It was just a matter of time until the US had its own personal interests at heart when discussing and acting on the modern day version of international war - terrorism. How will that threat be deterred or, hopefully, eradicated now that the world's only superpower has taken up the challenge, burden and duty of "saving the world" from its latest threat of extinction? Only leadership, bipartisan Congressional support and unwavering support from a world shocked to its foundations will answer that question.

An immediate military response of some sort will likely come - even if only to show the world that we mean business and to give people a feeling of short-term satisfaction. It is necessary to take that first decisive military action to set a precedent for future actions by the US and its allies around the world.

I am overwhelmed by the outpouring of compassion and support from around the world. If one were to see just these reports, the magnitude of what happened would be clear. It is both ironic and magnificent to see the effect of an event in New York City evoking such an international outpouring of emotion. Yes, of course the attack was on America, but it was those too-often-maligned New Yorkers whose courage, bravery and devastation have captured the attention of the world. New Yorkers have shown the world how magnificent we really are; the world has shown New Yorkers how much it really does care about them, America and humanity.

Wednesday morning I proudly draped a 6 foot long American flag over the railing of my terrace. It was the only flag displayed in our building. Yesterday a few more appeared. Standing on my flag draped terrace, I look out over the Hudson down toward the financial district. Where the twin towers once anchored the city skyline, I see only smoke - smoke portending a different world for all of us.

And I cannot stop watching the news.