Translate

Powered by Blogger.

Thursday, May 31, 2012

Christopher Columbus Secretly Jewish


***

[A hat tip to my nephew Dustin for sending this article.]




Was Columbus secretly a Jew?

By Charles Garcia, Special to CNN

May 20, 2012



Christopher Columbus bids farewell to his son Diego at Palos, Spain, before embarking on his first voyage on August 3, 1492.


Editor’s note: Charles Garcia is the CEO of Garcia Trujillo, a business focused on the Hispanic market, and the author of “Leadership Lessons of the White House Fellows.” A native of Panama, he now lives in Florida. Follow him on Twitter: @charlespgarcia. Lea este artículo en español/Read this article in Spanish.

(CNN) – Today [May 20, 2012] marks the 508th anniversary of the death of Christopher Columbus.

Everybody knows the story of Columbus, right? He was an Italian explorer from Genoa who set sail in 1492 to enrich the Spanish monarchs with gold and spices from the orient. Not quite.

For too long, scholars have ignored Columbus’s grand passion: the quest to liberate Jerusalem from the Muslims.

During Columbus’s lifetime, Jews became the target of fanatical religious persecution. On March 31, 1492, King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella proclaimed that all Jews were to be expelled from Spain. The edict especially targeted the 800,000 Jews who had never converted, and gave them four months to pack up and get out.

The Jews who were forced to renounce Judaism and embrace Catholicism were known as “Conversos,” or converts. There were also those who feigned conversion, practicing Catholicism outwardly while covertly practicing Judaism, the so-called “Marranos,” or swine.

Tens of thousands of Marranos were tortured by the Spanish Inquisition. They were pressured to offer names of friends and family members, who were ultimately paraded in front of crowds, tied to stakes and burned alive. Their land and personal possessions were then divvied up by the church and crown.

Recently, a number of Spanish scholars, such as Jose Erugo, Celso Garcia de la Riega, Otero Sanchez and Nicholas Dias Perez, have concluded that Columbus was a Marrano, whose survival depended upon the suppression of all evidence of his Jewish background in face of the brutal, systematic ethnic cleansing.

Columbus, who was known in Spain as Cristóbal Colón and didn’t speak Italian, signed his last will and testament on May 19, 1506, and made five curious – and revealing – provisions.

Two of his wishes – tithe one-tenth of his income to the poor and provide an anonymous dowry for poor girls – are part of Jewish customs. He also decreed to give money to a Jew who lived at the entrance of the Lisbon Jewish Quarter.

On those documents, Columbus used a triangular signature of dots and letters that resembled inscriptions found on gravestones of Jewish cemeteries in Spain. He ordered his heirs to use the signature in perpetuity.

According to British historian Cecil Roth’s “The History of the Marranos,” the anagram was a cryptic substitute for the Kaddish, a prayer recited in the synagogue by mourners after the death of a close relative. Thus, Columbus’s subterfuge allowed his sons to say Kaddish for their crypto-Jewish father when he died. Finally, Columbus left money to support the crusade he hoped his successors would take up to liberate the Holy Land.

Estelle Irizarry, a linguistics professor at Georgetown University, has analyzed the language and syntax of hundreds of handwritten letters, diaries and documents of Columbus and concluded that the explorer’s primary written and spoken language was Castilian Spanish. Irizarry explains that 15th-century Castilian Spanish was the “Yiddish” of Spanish Jewry, known as “Ladino.” At the top left-hand corner of all but one of the 13 letters written by Columbus to his son Diego contained the handwritten Hebrew letters bet-hei, meaning b’ezrat Hashem (with God’s help). Observant Jews have for centuries customarily added this blessing to their letters. No letters to outsiders bear this mark, and the one letter to Diego in which this was omitted was one meant for King Ferdinand.

In Simon Weisenthal’s book, “Sails of Hope,” he argues that Columbus’s voyage was motivated by a desire to find a safe haven for the Jews in light of their expulsion from Spain. Likewise, Carol Delaney, a cultural anthropologist at Stanford University, concludes that Columbus was a deeply religious man whose purpose was to sail to Asia to obtain gold in order to finance a crusade to take back Jerusalem and rebuild the Jews’ holy Temple.

In Columbus’s day, Jews widely believed that Jerusalem had to be liberated and the Temple rebuilt for the Messiah to return.

Scholars point to the date on which Columbus set sail as further evidence of his true motives. He was originally going to sail on August 2, 1492, a day that happened to coincide with the Jewish holiday of Tisha B’Av, marking the destruction of the First and Second Holy Temples of Jerusalem. Columbus postponed this original sail date by one day to avoid embarking on the holiday, which would have been considered by Jews to be an unlucky day to set sail. (Coincidentally or significantly, the day he set forth was the very day that Jews were, by law, given the choice of converting, leaving Spain, or being killed.)

Columbus’s voyage was not, as is commonly believed, funded by the deep pockets of Queen Isabella, but rather by two Jewish Conversos and another prominent Jew. Louis de Santangel and Gabriel Sanchez advanced an interest free loan of 17,000 ducats from their own pockets to help pay for the voyage, as did Don Isaac Abrabanel, rabbi and Jewish statesman.

Indeed, the first two letters Columbus sent back from his journey were not to Ferdinand and Isabella, but to Santangel and Sanchez, thanking them for their support and telling them what he had found.

The evidence seem to bear out a far more complicated picture of the man for whom our nation now celebrates a national holiday and has named its capital.

As we witness bloodshed the world over in the name of religious freedom, it is valuable to take another look at the man who sailed the seas in search of such freedoms – landing in a place that would eventually come to hold such an ideal at its very core. [emphasis added]


***

Sunday, May 27, 2012

Australian Teen’s Final Goodbye


***
 
“My Final Goodbye”



^^^

Skeptics never rest. Shaun was besieged by doubters prompting him to strip off his shirt revealing the torso-long scar from his 2 transplants.

“I Am Not a Fake”



^^^

Australia teen dies after YouTube 'Final Goodbye' video goes viral


by Jim Gold, msnbc.com

May 26, 2012


Australia teenager Shaun Wilson-Miller died Saturday, just weeks after posting his emotional "My Final Goodbye" message that went viral on YouTube.

In the 17-year-old's video, intended for family and friends but seen by 1.9 million people by Sunday morning, the Melbourne schoolboy revealed he was suffering chronic heart rejection after his second transplant and that there could not be a third.

"I won't be here for as long as I thought,'' he said in the video.

"This has been an awesome ride. I have no regrets,” he said. “Live life to the fullest because you never know what's going to happen.''

Dad Cameron Miller said his son's positive outlook had never faltered, with Shaun giving him constant hugs in recent days, the Herald Sun reported Sunday.

"He passed peacefully with me holding his hand; that is something the family will hold with us,'' he told the Herald Sun.

Tributes immediately began flowing in from around the world and from his beloved Essendon Football Club, the newspaper said.

He had also found love with a fellow heart patient, the Herald Sun reported.

Shaun had sighed: "The hardest thing for me is leaving her, knowing that I won't get to marry her. To have kids together. To grow old together. That is what makes me sad.''

He recently filmed a guest appearance on the Australian TV show “The Neighbors” and met Essendon captain Jobe Watson.

Condolences message on his parents Facebook pages include, "You showed so much courage for so long,'' ninemsn TV reported. "Fly high sweet angel. A June 15 fundraiser Shaun was planning for Heartkids has now been turned into a tribute for the teen, ninemsn reported.



***

Wednesday, May 16, 2012

LGBT Equality: “Smug Derision Is a Kind of Stupidity”


***



Marriage Equality and Humanist Evolution

by Ta-Nehisi Coates

May 14, 2012
 

Applauding the president for endorsing same-sex marriage last week, the rapper said, “I think it’s the right thing to do ... whether it costs him votes or not.” 

“I’ve always thought it as something that was still, um, holding the country back,” Jay-Z explained. “What people do in their own homes is their business and you can choose to love whoever you love. That’s their business. It’s no different than discriminating against blacks. It’s discrimination plain and simple.”


It’s aways [sic] wild seeing rappers come out against homophobia. I’ve got more than my share of songs I can’t really enjoy like I once did. 

But it’s good to see, and I can’t even say I live outside of it. I can remember coming out of Baltimore and viewing every interaction with someone who was gay with a kind of smug derision. It’s the closest I’ve come to a kind of deep, unstated pride in ignorance—not so much a violent hostility, but a meanness based almost entirely on not understanding. And frankly not even believing there was anything worth understanding.

When I write with some curiosity about the racist mind, this is really place I’m pulling from. I know how easy it is to believe that people have nothing to contribute, and to hold that belief not out of evidence of their lives, but out of ignorance of them. Still it’s one thing for people to tell you why that’s wrong—and that’s important. But it’s only philosophy. For the facts, I needed real world contact with actual people. I could not simply be told that “diversity is good.” I had to see it.

It was a really nice day in New York yesterday. I took my wife and son out for brunch, then roamed a bit with Kenyatta. We ended up in West Village and I was suddenly struck by how thankful I was to gay America. There is probably a more agile way to say that. But the fact is this. You can’t really do my job, and live where I have lived, and live how I lived and not deal with the LGBT world. I would go so far as to say that if you are a writer with aspiration, homophobia is bad for business.

But less cynically, if you are a curious person homophobia is bad for business. I was lucky. I got schooled on that as a young man. And, as always—in the spirit of selfishness—it was not good for LGBT world that that happened. It was good for me. Smug derision is a kind of stupidity. And people who know better are embarrassed for you, because you are not wise enough to be embarrassed for yourself. The city saved me from that. And I’m happy.

The funny thing is I’m pretty sure even in my other life I would have supported marriage equality. Whatever, my ignorance—“an offense against God” didn’t factor in. And the notion that consenting adults could live as they willed would have disturbed me. But that isn’t actual enlightenment. Surely there are racists who voted for Obama.


***

Tuesday, May 15, 2012

Having a Gay Friend or Relative Can Make Marriage Equality Personal


***

[Ed. Note: Since coming out in 1970 it has been my mission to open people’s minds to gay people being just like regular folks except for sexual preference. For some that was (and still is) a revelation. I accomplish my mission one person at a time hoping that each opened mind will open others. Personal experience with gay people as ordinary folks is the most powerful means of enlightenment.]

^^^


 


For Some, Same-Sex Marriage Is Not Politics, It’s Personal

by helene cooper and jeremy w. peters

May 15, 2012

WASHINGTON — Some of their best friends turned out to be gay.

Or a daughter (Dick Cheney). Or a close pal (Jon M. Huntsman Jr.). Or a couple seated close by (the Maryland lawmaker Wade Kach).

President Obama’s embrace of same-sex marriage rights last week instantly touched off speculation about the possible political implications, but that misses a more nuanced point. Like so many other Americans in recent years, politicians are less influenced by party, faith or color on the question of favoring greater legal protections for gays, both liberals and conservatives say.

Instead, it’s more personal.

“If you don’t know anyone who’s gay, then it’s an alien lifestyle,” said Theodore Olson, the former solicitor general for President George W. Bush who supports same-sex marriage. But, he added, when “you realize that that’s Mary from down the street, she’s a lesbian and she’s with Sally, what would it be like if they couldn’t be together?” people come around.

During the civil rights movement, many white Northerners — including some who had never before interacted with black people — joined African-Americans to fight for the principle of equal rights, often opposing white Southerners who had lived among blacks all their lives yet saw nothing wrong with the separate but equal statutes. Principle seemed to come before the personal in many cases.

With the gay rights movement, it often seems that the opposite applies. While there are many people who support gay rights because it is in line with their personal or political views, for many others, their approach on the issue is experiential, and comes down to a simple issue: knowing an openly gay couple. In fact, it can seem as if there are two Americas when it comes to gay rights: one in which same-sex couples interact regularly with their straight counterparts, helping to soften impressions of homosexuality, and another in which being gay or lesbian remains largely unspoken.

Read full article here:


***

Monday, May 14, 2012

The Impossible Texting & Driving Test

***




***

Thumping the Bible For Slavery & Against Gay Marriage


***



Unions That Divide: Churches Split Over Gay Marriage


Published: May 13, 2012


The faith divide resembles what the nation experienced in the debates over slavery, said Michael Coogan, a lecturer in Old Testament and Hebrew Bible at Harvard Divinity School and the author of “God and Sex: What the Bible Really Says.”

“The proslavery contingent quoted the Bible repeatedly, saying that God has all these commandments about slavery and nowhere in the Bible, including the New Testament, is it stated that there’s anything wrong with slavery,” Mr. Coogan said. “The abolitionists also quoted the Bible, but used the same sort of more general texts that supporters of same-sex relationships are using: love your neighbor, treat others as you would have them treat you, the golden rule.”


Read full article here:



For more “truths” from the Bible, see here:


***

Saturday, May 12, 2012

President Barack Obama: “same sex couples should be able to get married"



"I have to tell you that over the course of several years as I have talked to friends and family and neighbors, when I think about members of my own staff who are in incredibly committed monogamous relationships, same-sex relationships, who are raising kids together; when I think about those soldiers or airmen or marines or sailors who are out there fighting on my behalf and yet feel constrained, even now that 'don't ask, don't tell' is gone, because they are not able to commit themselves in a marriage, at a certain point I've just concluded that for me personally it is important for me to go ahead and affirm that I think same sex couples should be able to get married."

US President Barack Obama - May 9, 2012 

***

President Obama’s Courageous Stand Against Prejudice


***



A Watershed Move, Both Risky and Inevitable

by adam nagourney  •  May 9, 2012

President Obama’s endorsement of gay marriage on Wednesday was by any measure a watershed. A sitting United States president took sides in what many people consider the last civil rights movement, providing the most powerful evidence to date of how rapidly views are moving on an issue that was politically toxic just five years ago.

Mr. Obama faces considerable risk in jumping into this debate, reluctantly or not, in the heat of what is expected to be a close election. The day before he announced his position, voters in North Carolina — a critical state for Mr. Obama and the site of the Democratic convention this summer — approved by a 20-point margin a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage. It was the 31st state to pass such an amendment.

As George W. Bush demonstrated in 2004, when his campaign engineered initiatives against gay marriage in a series of swing states, opponents are far more likely to vote on these issues than supporters. Mitt Romney, the probable Republican presidential candidate, was quick to proclaim his opposition to gay marriage after Mr. Obama spoke. And however much national attitudes may be shifting, the issue remains highly contentious among black and Latino voters, two groups central to Mr. Obama’s success.

Yet as Mr. Obama has clearly come to recognize, the forces of history appear to be changing. The president was at risk of seeming politically timid and calculating, standing at the sidelines while a large number of Americans — including members of both parties — embraced gay marriage. That is a particularly discordant image, many Democrats said, for the man who was the nation’s first black president.

Mr. Obama’s declaration may have been belated and unplanned, forced out after his vice president, Joseph R. Biden Jr., during a television interview on Sunday declared his support for same-sex marriage. Still, it is a huge voice added to a chorus that has become increasingly robust, a reminder that a view that had once been relegated to the dark sidelines of political debate has become mainstream.

The very riskiness of what Mr. Obama did — some commentators were invoking Lyndon B. Johnson’s embrace of civil rights in 1964, with all the attendant political perils — made it hard to understate the historic significance of what took place at the White House on Wednesday.

“If you are one of those who care about this issue, you will not forget where you were when you saw the president deliver those remarks,” said Chad Griffin, the incoming president of the Human Rights Campaign, a gay advocacy group. “Regardless of how old you are, it’s the first time you have ever seen a president of the United States look into a camera and say that a gay person should be treated equally under the law. The message that that sends, to a young gay or transgendered person struggling to come out, is life changing.”

It also was a reminder of just how quickly public and political attitudes are changing. The first organizers of the modern gay-rights movement, after the June 1969 raid on the Stonewall Inn in Greenwich Village in New York City, considered themselves bold in hoping they could pass nondiscrimination acts. They did not seriously contemplate a day when members of the same sex would be permitted to marry.

It has been only 16 years since Bill Clinton — the second Democratic presidential candidate to campaign before a gay audience at an event open to the news media — signed the Defense of Marriage Act, which defined marriage as the union of a man and a woman, permitting states to refuse to recognize same-sex marriages conducted in other states.

Mr. Clinton advocated the bill in the midst of a re-election campaign after his aides concluded that opposing it might be risky. Mr. Clinton has since said he regrets that decision; Mr. Obama instructed his Justice Department not to defend the act.

In some ways, Mr. Obama is late to the party. Mr. Biden was just the latest prominent Democrat to announce his support, and many now say that it seems unthinkable that by 2016 any serious Democratic presidential candidate would oppose gay marriage. A series of significant Republican figures — Ken Mehlman, the former Republican Party chairman, Theodore Olson, who was solicitor general under Mr. Bush — have also been active in pushing gay marriage.

The North Carolina vote in some ways distracts from what polling shows to be a steady increase in the percentage of Americans who say they support gay marriage or domestic partnerships; it is now a majority. The numbers are particularly high among younger Americans, suggesting that this is a wave likelier to grow than to recede.

All of which suggests that there are, in addition to the risks, clear potential upsides for Mr. Obama. His announcement, while symbolic rather than carrying the force of law, could energize big parts of his base, particularly younger voters, and reassure liberal Democrats who had been disappointed with Mr. Obama on this issue. It will no doubt help with gay people, already among his biggest donors.

And Mr. Obama’s announcement came as Mr. Romney has been seeking to shift to the middle; independent voters and women are two constituencies that tend to support gay marriage. Now, though, he is almost certainly going to face pressure from his base to take the fight on gay marriage to Mr. Obama.

“President Obama has now made the definition of marriage a defining issue in the presidential contest, especially in swing states like Ohio, North Carolina, Virginia, Florida and Nevada,” said Brian S. Brown, the president of the National Organization for Marriage.

In truth, Republicans and Democrats are hardly sure whether this will be a deciding issue in any state, given how pressing economic concerns are, particularly in the swing states.

Polls show that gay marriage is not a huge concern to swing voters. Is Mr. Romney really going to want to spend the next five months talking about gay marriage, rather than the economy and jobs? And Mr. Obama may be no more eager to discuss the issue further, to be drawn into the weeds of this argument.

Yet perhaps on this day, short-term political calculations are not what people are likely to recall in talking about Mr. Obama’s interview in years to come.

“I don’t think it’s about particular states or particular demographics,” said Steve Elmendorf, a Democratic strategist.

“He said the right thing,” he said. “He did the right thing. People are going to overanalyze the politics of this.”


***

Thursday, May 10, 2012

Texas Rapper Adair Lion: "Gay is Okay"


***






^^^


Lyrics:

HOOK (full)
Ben most people would turn you away
I don't listen to a word they say
They don't see you as I do
I wish they would try to
I'm sure they'd think again
if they had a friend like Ben

VERSE 1
uh My name's Adair and I'm here to recruit you
What up Hip-Hop Can I spit some taboo
Hello young world can I change your outlook
When I was growing up I was forced to give a frown look
to people who were different than me,
and I just accepted it man but I was so naive
see I was scholarship-ed to a private school
and in the hood I was with my vatos acting a fool
so either way being gay was wrong
it was against the hood laws or the laws of God
so... I didn't see them -they probably were scared straight
but I made a friend I never expected to make....
now, I can see all the hate reaction on your face
this subjects not the type that hip-hop embrace
but its long overdue... where you at Wayne
I said its long overdue where you at Ye? 
I mean...

HOOK (half) 
they don't see you as I do
I wish they would try to
I'm sure they'd think again
if they had a friend like Ben

VERSE 2 
Ben you're my friend in case you unaware
Adair Lion does if nobody else care
and I've never been the type to harp on what others think of me
so there's no wonder why I call out all this bigotry
Being Christian its hard to say this...
but the Bible was wrong this time...
Its in every species and every family I've met
so I don't see why to the world its a crime
you see logistically
and statically
not every dancer dude is gay
not every football players straight
and thats crazy huh, but thats fact yo!
and thats the same anywhere, even rap yo!
oh you don't see that...
you don't believe that...
I guess him over there he chose to be Black...
and her Asian...
and them White...
and those God awful gays chose to live that life, huh?!

HOOK (half) 
they don't see you as I do
I wish they would try to
I'm sure they'd think again
if they had a friend like Ben

VERSE 3
Ben I dont know if my friends will back me up on this
they might turn their backs and say that I'm a bitch
and I know if you come out you'll get the same shit
but we dont need that kind of peeps in our relationship
"gay is okay" the number one thing a rapper shouldn't say...
I said it anyway and I made history...
(and) to all the little dudes learning to mack
the hottest chicks got a gay in their clique, remember that
Ben this songs for you while your growing up
'cause I don't wanna see you break and say you've had enough
It doesn't just get better, it gets awesome homie
what I mean is I just wanna see you blossom homie
its just they never really miss you 'til you (are) dead or your gone
so on that note, Im leaving after this song
you ain't gotta feel any way about Adair for long
but at least let Michael tell you why I'm this way...hold on

HOOK (full)
Ben most people would turn you away
I don't listen to a word they say
They don't see you as I do
I wish they would try to
I'm sure they'd think again
if they had a friend like Ben

OUTRO
Coincidentally, Ben is the name of someone I've never met...my dad.
So why would I ever judge someone who is trying to be two of what I never had?

***

Sunday, May 6, 2012

Yosemite Range of Light


***



click to play then double click for full screen





***

Wednesday, May 2, 2012

The Grandma Excuse


***



From now.msn.com:

Who among us hasn't killed off nana to get out of going to work? Well, Argentine job site Zonajobs says it's time find a job you actually want to go to and let grandma rest in peace. To make their point, the site's new ad shows the sweetest little old lady you could ever imagine suffering such ignominious deaths as getting hit by a bus and having a piano fall on her. But with each death, she rises from her grave to provide fodder for a new excuse. Even if you opt to use more removed relatives like cousins and great uncles as your get-out-of-work pawns, this should make you feel sufficiently guilty. And call your grandma while you're at it.


***

President Obama Speaks to Troops at Bagram Air Base

***






***